Can We Judge Saints By Their Actions? The Controversy Between K. J. Clark and J. Hick

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14394/etyka.1357

Keywords:

Sainthood, moral act, epistemological position, Hick, Clark

Abstract

This analysis examines the positions of K. J. Clark and J. Hick on the possibility of identifying saints based on their actions. This includes the question of whether we are in an epistemic position that grants us sufficient access to other people’s motives, and also ethical considerations on the social and psychological effects of recognizing and praising saints. While both philosophers base sainthood on internal states, Clark rejects that we are capable of accurately assessing these, Hick, in turn, maintains the opposite stance. After presenting a few critical remarks, I conclude that neither perspective can be adopted in practice.

Downloads

Author Biography

Nicole Musioł, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

Nicole Anika Musioł, MA student, Philosophy, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań; BA, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Applied Anthropology.

References

Bordoni, Linda. 2020. “Mother Teresa: A Saint for all.” Vatican News, September 4, 2020.

Clark, Kelly James. 1997. “Perils of Pluralism.” Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers 14 (3): 303-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil199714330

Dennett, Daniel C. 2006. Breaking the Spell – Religion as Natural Phenomenon. United States of America: Viking Penguin.

English Standard Bible. ESV Online: Good News Publisher.

Hick, John. 1989. An Interpretation of Religion: Human Responses to the Transcendent. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Hick, John. 2006. The New Frontier of Religion and Science: Religious Experience, Neuroscience and the Transcendent. Hampshire-New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230626430_3

Hick, John. 2010. “Religious Pluralism.” In A Companion to Philosophy of Religion (Second Edition), edited by Charles Taliaferro and Paul Draper et. al., 710-17. Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444320152.ch84

Martin, Michael. 2010. “Theism and Incoherence.” In A Companion to Philosophy of Religion (Second Edition) edited by Charles Taliaferro and Paul Draper et al. 467-73. Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444320152.ch55

Rumi, Jalalu’l-Din. 2021. Rumi Mystic and Poet – Selections of His Writings. Edited by Reynolds A. Nicholson. Malaysia: Islamic Book Trust.

Ruse, Michael. 1984. “The Morality of the Gene.” The Monist 67, no. 2: 167-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19846727

Teresa Of Ávila. 1995. The Life of Teresa of Jesus. Carmelite Monks. Electronic text.

The Holy See.1997. Catechism of the Catholic Church (Second Edition). Città del Vaticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

Trinkaus Zagzebski, Linda. 2017. Exemplarist Moral Theory. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190655846.001.0001

Downloads

Published

2025-02-24

How to Cite

Musioł, Nicole. 2025. “Can We Judge Saints By Their Actions? The Controversy Between K. J. Clark and J. Hick”. Etyka, February. Warsaw, Poland. https://doi.org/10.14394/etyka.1357.

Issue

Section

Papers